Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.4 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13, 12 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2022-02-25 | 2020-04-04 |
| 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 799.00 | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | -- |
| 422 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.43 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.68 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S22 is better than the Galaxy XCover FieldPro, having a 93.4 score against 80.1. These devices work with Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy S22 has 13 version and Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo. Samsung Galaxy S22 is a newer cellphone, and it's also way lighter and way thinner than the Galaxy XCover FieldPro.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a processing unit that is very similar to the processor in Galaxy S22, and although the Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The Samsung Galaxy S22 features a much better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a much worse screen density and a bit worse 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution, it also counts with a bigger display.
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a quite bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S22, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with an external memory card slot that supports up to 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy S22 has a way better camera than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for shooting photographs and/or video in low-light environments, it also counts with a lot higher video resolution, a much more megapixels camera in the back and a much larger camera sensor.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro features improved battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S22, because it has a 22 percent greater battery size.
Even being the best phone in our current comparison, Samsung Galaxy S22 is also a bargain compared to others.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.