Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.4 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13, 12 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2022-02-25 | 2020-01-31 |
| 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 799.00 | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 422 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.43 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.68 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S22 has an overall score of 93.4, which is better than Galaxy XCover Pro's overall score of 81. Galaxy S22 is a way newer device, and it's also extremely thinner and noticeably lighter than Galaxy XCover Pro. Both phones we are comparing come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy S22 has a newer 13 version while Galaxy XCover Pro has Android 11 version.
Galaxy S22 has a bit more powerful processing unit than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy S22 also has more RAM. The Samsung Galaxy S22 has a way better screen than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, and they both have exactly the same 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution, the Samsung Galaxy S22 also counts with a just a bit more pixels per inch in the display.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a quite bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy S22, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy S22 shoots much better photos and videos than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for low-light images and videos, it also counts with a lot more MP camera in the back, a much bigger camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a way higher 7680x4320 video definition.
Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a bit better battery life than Samsung Galaxy S22, because it has a 9% greater battery size.
Galaxy S22 is way more expensive than Galaxy XCover Pro, but it's still a great choice, as you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.