Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.4 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13, 12 | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2022-02-25 | 2020-02-14 |
| 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 799.00 | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 422 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.43 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S22 has a global score of 93.4, which is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip's global score of 88.5. Even though the Samsung Galaxy S22 is a bit thicker than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, it's just a little bit lighter and also noticeably newer. These devices use Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy S22 has a more recent 13 version while Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has Android 12, so it provides a couple nice extra features and performance enhancements.
Galaxy Z Flip has a little bit better performance than Galaxy S22. Both of them have 8 cores and the same RAM amount. Samsung Galaxy S22 counts with a more vivid screen than Galaxy Z Flip, although it has a little bit lower 1080 x 2340 resolution, a just a bit lower quantity of pixels per inch in the display and a little bit smaller screen.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a much better storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy S22, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy S22 has just a bit longer battery life than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 12% larger battery capacity. Samsung Galaxy S22 counts with a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, and although they both have a same size aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S22 also has a way higher 7680x4320 video definition, a much bigger sensor which provides a way higher photo and video quality and a way better 50 mega pixels resolution camera.
Samsung Galaxy S22 is not only the best phones in our current comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.