Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.4 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13, 12 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2022-02-25 | 2020-09-18 |
| 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 799.00 | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 422 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.43 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a bit better than Galaxy S22, with a general score of 94.6 against 93.4. Both phones we compare here have Android OS, but the Galaxy Z Fold 2 has 11 version and Galaxy S22 has Android 13. Galaxy Z Fold 2 is an older and heavier device than Galaxy S22, but Samsung was able to make it a little bit thinner anyway.
Galaxy S22 counts with a lot better looking display than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a quite smaller screen and a lot lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, it also counts with a just a little more pixels per inch of screen. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a much greater storage capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy S22, because it has more internal memory.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a bit superior processor than Galaxy S22, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Galaxy S22 features a superior camera than Galaxy Z Fold 2, and although they both have a same size aperture, the Galaxy S22 also has a lot better 7680x4320 video definition, a larger sensor and a much more mega-pixels back camera.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with longer battery lifetime than Galaxy S22, because it has a 22 percent larger battery size.
Although Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Samsung Galaxy S22, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Samsung Galaxy S22. If you prefer to save some money, you can get the Samsung Galaxy S22, giving up a few features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.