Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.4 | 90.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13, 12 | Android 11 |
| 2022-02-25 | 2021-08-11 |
| 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches | 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 9.56 ounces |
| Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White | Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 799.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 422 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.43 | 7.7 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S22 has a general score of 93.4, which is a bit better than Galaxy Z Fold 3's 90.6 overall score. These devices include Android operating system, but the Galaxy S22 has a newer 13 version and Galaxy Z Fold 3 has Android 11 version, giving a couple additional features and enhanced performance. Even though the Galaxy S22 and the Galaxy Z Fold 3 were released with only 7 months difference, the Galaxy S22 body is lighter but also somewhat thicker.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 has a much sharper screen than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a lot lower 1080 x 2340 resolution and a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little better pixels density. Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a little faster processing unit than Galaxy S22, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has more RAM.
The Galaxy S22 counts with a greater camera than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a back facing camera with a way higher resolution and a larger camera aperture to capture better captures in low-light situations. The Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a way bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy S22, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity.
Galaxy Z Fold 3 has just a little better battery life than Samsung Galaxy S22, because it has a 19 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.