Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.4 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13, 12 | Android 14 |
| 2022-02-25 | -- |
| 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches | 6.04 x 5.22 x 0.22 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 8.32 ounces |
| Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White | Black Shadow |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 799.00 | $ 2020.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2184 x 1968 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 422 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.8 | 9.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy SM8650-AC (4 nm) chipset |
| Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.45 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.43 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S22 is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, with a 93.4 score against 91.1. The Samsung Galaxy S22 construction is way thicker but notably lighter than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition. Both devices in our current comparison have Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy S22 has older 13 version while Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition has Android 14.
Galaxy S22 has a little more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, because although it has a much lower 1080 x 2340 resolution, a lot smaller display and much worse brightness, it also counts with a just a bit better pixel amount per display inch. Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition has much more memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S22, because it has more internal memory.
Galaxy S22 features a very superior processing power than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores. The Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition counts with a bit better battery life than Galaxy S22, because it has a 4400mAh battery capacity instead of 3700mAh.
The Galaxy S22 shoots much better photos and videos than Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, although it has a much less mega-pixels resolution back camera, they both have a F1.8 aperture.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, Samsung Galaxy S22 is also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.