Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.4 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 13, 12 | Android 10 |
| 2022-02-25 | 2020-05-08 |
| 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches | 6.64 x 3.04 x 0.41 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White | Armor gray, Lightning black and Star silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 799.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 422 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.43 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 4720mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.68 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S22 has a score of 93.4, which is a little bit better than the Xiaomi Black Shark 3's 86.6 overall score. The Galaxy S22 body is newer, much lighter and thinner than Xiaomi Black Shark 3. Both of these phones work with Android OS, but the Galaxy S22 has the newer 13 version while Xiaomi Black Shark 3 has Android 10 version, counting with lots of additional features and performance tweaks.
Samsung Galaxy S22 features a much more vibrant display than Xiaomi Black Shark 3, because although it has a bit smaller display and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2340, it also counts with a just a bit greater screen density. Xiaomi Black Shark 3's storage to install games and applications is very similar to the Galaxy S22 one, they have equal 128 GB internal storage.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 counts with a bit superior processing unit than Samsung Galaxy S22. Both have the same RAM memory amount and the same number of cores. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 counts with better battery life than Galaxy S22, because it has a 4720mAh battery size. Xiaomi Black Shark 3's camera is just as good as the camera in Samsung Galaxy S22, because although the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 has a smaller back camera sensor which gives a lower image and video quality, and they both have the same camera aperture and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, it also counts with higher video frame rate and a back-facing camera with way more mega pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.