Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.4 | 90.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 13, 12 | Android 10 |
| 2022-02-25 | 2020-05-08 |
| 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches | 7.00 x 3.28 x 0.40 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White | Blasting black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 799.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 7.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 422 pixels per inch | 484 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.43 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.68 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S22 is slightly better than Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro, getting a 93.4 score against 90.1. Samsung Galaxy S22's construction is newer, noticeably thinner and much lighter than Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro. Both of these devices include Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy S22 has 13 version while Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has Android 10.
Samsung Galaxy S22 counts with a better looking screen than Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro, although it has a just a little inferior count of pixels per screen inch, a way worse 1080 x 2340 resolution and a bit smaller screen. The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has just a little better hardware performance than Galaxy S22. They have the same number of cores and a 8 GB RAM.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro counts with a much better memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S22, because it has 256 GB internal storage. The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro counts with a camera that's just as good as the camera in Galaxy S22, because although the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has a tinier back-facing camera sensor which offers a lower photo and video quality, and they both have a same size camera aperture and the same video definition, it also counts with better 60 frames per second video frame rate and a lot better 64 MP resolution back-facing camera.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro features better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S22, because it has a 35 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.