Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.4 | 88.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 13, 12 | Android 10 |
| 2022-02-25 | 2019-09-24 |
| 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches | 6.08 x 2.85 x 0.41 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 8.50 ounces |
| Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Titanium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 799.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 7.9 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2250 x 2088 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 422 pixels per inch | 389 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 108.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.43 | 10.56 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 4050mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.68 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S22 is slightly better than Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha, with a global score of 93.4 against 88.9. Galaxy S22 is a way newer cellphone, and it's also notably lighter and a lot thinner than Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha. Both devices we are comparing work with Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy S22 has 13 version while Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha has Android 10 version, so it gives you some extra features.
Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha has a bit faster CPU than Galaxy S22, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha also has 4 GB more RAM memory. The Galaxy S22 features a brighter screen than Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha, because although it has a lot lower 1080 x 2340 resolution and a really smaller screen, it also counts with a little better pixels density.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha has much more storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S22, because it has more internal storage capacity. The Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha counts with a bit longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S22, because it has a 4050mAh battery size against 3700mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 has a better camera than Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not favorable for taking photographs or video in low light environments, a much worse 50 mega pixels resolution back facing camera and a tinier camera sensor, it also counts with a much higher 7680x4320 video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.