Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.9 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 13 | -- |
| -- | 2017-11-03 |
| 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| -- | 6.14 ounces |
| -- | Silver and Space gray |
| -- | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 422 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 6.21 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.84 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone X has a score of 88.1, which is better than the Galaxy S23's overall score of 77.9. Apple iPhone X is a heavier cellphone than the Galaxy S23, but both of them have the same thickness. The Apple iPhone X has a more vivid display than Galaxy S23, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a bit better display pixel density and a slightly better 1125 x 2436 pixels resolution.
The iPhone X has a much better memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S23, because it has more internal storage capacity. Apple iPhone X has a way better processing power than Galaxy S23, because although it has a lower number of cores (although faster) and a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a 64 bits CPU.
The iPhone X has a camera that is very similar to the camera in Galaxy S23, and although the iPhone X has a much less mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera and a lot tinier back camera sensor which provides a much worse image and video quality, they both have a same size diafragm aperture. Samsung Galaxy S23 counts with a way better battery performance than Apple iPhone X, because it has a 44 percent greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.