Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.9 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 13 | -- |
| -- | 2020-05-15 |
| 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| -- | 6.35 ounces |
| -- | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 422 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.84 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Velvet is much better than Galaxy S23, with a global score of 87.1 against 77.9. The LG Velvet counts with a lot better performance than Galaxy S23, although it has 2 GB lesser RAM, they both have 8 cores. LG Velvet has a slightly better looking display than Galaxy S23, because although it has a just a little worse screen density, it also counts with a slightly better 1080 x 2460px resolution and a bit larger display.
LG Velvet captures much clearer photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy S23, although it has a way tinier sensor taking much lower quality images and a worse 48 MP resolution camera in the back, they both have a F1.8 aperture. LG Velvet has a way bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy S23, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage, the LG Velvet also has an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
LG Velvet counts with a little better battery performance than Galaxy S23, because it has a 4300mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.