Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.9 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-10-20 |
| 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| -- | 5.86 ounces |
| -- | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 422 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.84 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50s is much better than the Galaxy S23, with an 86.6 score against 77.9. Galaxy A50s is a way heavier device than Galaxy S23, but both of them are 0.3inches thick. Both phones we compare here use Android OS, but Galaxy A50s has the older 10 version and Galaxy S23 has Android 13. The Galaxy A50s counts with a much faster processing unit than Galaxy S23, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
The Samsung Galaxy A50s counts with a bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy S23, because although it has a quite lower screen pixel density, and they both have an equal 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A50s also counts with a little bigger display. The Samsung Galaxy A50s counts with a much bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S23, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy A50s also has a SD card slot that allows up to 512 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy A50s counts with a better camera than Galaxy S23, although it has a camera with a worse resolution, a smaller aperture which is not recommended for low-light captures and videos and a lot smaller camera sensor. Samsung Galaxy A50s has just a little better battery life than Samsung Galaxy S23, because it has a 3% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.