Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.9 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 11, 10 |
| -- | 2019-12-27 |
| 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches | 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches |
| -- | 6.07 ounces |
| -- | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 282.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 422 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.84 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A51 is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy S23, having an 85.5 score against 77.9. These devices work with Android operating system, but Galaxy A51 has the previous 11 version while Samsung Galaxy S23 has Android 13 version. The Galaxy A51 counts with a little bit better screen than Galaxy S23, because although it has a little less pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a slightly higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and a little bit larger screen.
The Galaxy A51 counts with a much greater storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy S23, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage, the Galaxy A51 also has a SD card slot that allows up to 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy A51 features a very superior performance than Samsung Galaxy S23, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 CPU cores.
The Galaxy A51 features just a bit better battery lifetime than Galaxy S23, because it has a 4000mAh battery size against 3900mAh. The Galaxy A51 takes much clearer pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy S23, although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not good for low-light images and video, a camera in the back with lesser mega pixels resolution and a way smaller sensor taking less light and duller colors.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.