Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.9 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13 | -- |
| -- | 2015-08-21 |
| 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| -- | 6.03 ounces |
| -- | Black sapphire, Gold platinum, Silver titan and White pearl |
| -- | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 422 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.84 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note5 is just a bit better than the Galaxy S23, with an 80.2 score against 77.9. Samsung Galaxy Note5 is a a lot heavier device than Galaxy S23, but both of them are equally thin. Samsung Galaxy Note5 features a much more powerful processor than Samsung Galaxy S23, although it has 4 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
The Samsung Galaxy Note5 has a better display than Galaxy S23, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a little greater pixel quantity in each inch in the display and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels. Galaxy S23 counts with a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note5, because it has a bigger diafragm aperture for better low light photos and video, a lot bigger sensor providing a lot higher image quality and a back camera with a much higher 50 mega-pixels resolution.
Galaxy S23 counts with a much better storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy Note5, because it has more internal storage. Galaxy S23 features improved battery life than Galaxy Note5, because it has a 30 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.