Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.9 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 13 | Android 10 |
| -- | 2020-05-05 |
| 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| -- | 7.37 ounces |
| -- | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 422 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.84 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a general score of 81.1, which is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy S23's 77.9 score. Both phones in our current comparison work with Android OS (operating system), but Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has older 10 version and Samsung Galaxy S23 has Android 13. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a much better performing processor than Samsung Galaxy S23, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a bit sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy S23, because although it has a bit less pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a bit larger display and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro takes better pictures and videos than Galaxy S23, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not good for low-light photos and videos and a tinier camera sensor providing a lower image quality, it also counts with a way higher 64 megapixels resolution camera.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy S23, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 512 GB. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S23, because it has 5020mAh of battery capacity instead of 3900mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.