Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 83 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 14 | iOS 9.x |
| -- | 2015-09-09 |
| 6.38 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches | 5.44 x 2.64 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.51 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Blue, Graphite, Gray, Mint and Yellow | Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminium, Glass and Steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 650.00 | $ 575.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 750 x 1334 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 385 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| 1900 cd/m2 brightness | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 9.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 2400e (4 nm) chipset | Apple A9 APL0898 chipset |
| processor | 64-bit Twister, 64-bit (Dual-Core 1840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 2 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Xclipse 940 GPU | PowerVR GT7600 (650 MHz) GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 29.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 6.9 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Nano SIM Battery | 1715mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 240 hours standby time 14 hours talk time |
| 6.56 | 3.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 6s is a bit better than the Galaxy S24 FE, having a global score of 83 against 76. The Apple iPhone 6s has iOS 9.x operating system, while Galaxy S24 FE comes with Android 14 operating system. Apple iPhone 6s's body is lighter and a little bit thinner than the Galaxy S24 FE. IPhone 6s features a very superior processing unit than Galaxy S24 FE, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with an additional graphics processor, a larger number of cores and a 64 bits processor.
Galaxy S24 FE features a bit more vivid display than Apple iPhone 6s, because it has a lot bigger display, much more screen brightness, a way better resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a little more pixels per inch in the display. The Apple iPhone 6s features as much memory capacity to store more games and applications as the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE, both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity.
The Galaxy S24 FE has a very superior battery duration than iPhone 6s, because it has a 4700mAh battery size. Apple iPhone 6s takes a bit better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy S24 FE, although it has a back camera with a much lower 12 mega pixels resolution and a smaller aperture which is not so good for low-light photography and videos.
The Apple iPhone 6s is not only the best phones in this comparison, but it's also the cheapest, making it an easy choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.