Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | -- |
| -- | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.38 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.51 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Blue, Graphite, Gray, Mint and Yellow | Black, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 650.00 | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| 1900 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 2400e (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Xclipse 940 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Nano SIM Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.56 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3 is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE, having an 80 score against 76. Google Pixel 3's body has the same thickness than the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE, but it is much lighter. Samsung Galaxy S24 FE has a sharper display than Google Pixel 3, because although it has a just a bit inferior pixel quantity in each screen inch, it also counts with a larger screen and a slightly better 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution.
Google Pixel 3 features a much more powerful CPU than Galaxy S24 FE, because although it has less RAM memory, it also counts with a greater number of cores. Google Pixel 3 counts with a bit better camera than Galaxy S24 FE, although it has a camera in the back with a lot worse resolution, they both have the same diafragm aperture.
Galaxy S24 FE counts with much more memory capacity for apps and games than Google Pixel 3, because it has more internal storage. Samsung Galaxy S24 FE has a much better battery lifetime than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 61% greater battery capacity.
Google Pixel 3 is not only the best phones in our current comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.