Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | HTC |
| Android 14 | Android 5.0 |
| -- | 2015-03-01 |
| 6.38 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.51 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Blue, Graphite, Gray, Mint and Yellow | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 650.00 | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | S-LCD 3 |
| 385 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 1900 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 9.2 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 2400e (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Xclipse 940 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 27.80mm focal length |
| -- | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.35 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Nano SIM Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 6.56 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
HTC One M9 has a score of 77.7, which is a little bit better than Galaxy S24 FE's 76 general score. The HTC One M9 is a thicker but incredibly lighter phone than Galaxy S24 FE. These phones have Android OS (Operating System), but the HTC One M9 has older 5.0 version while Galaxy S24 FE has Android 14 version.
HTC One M9 features just a bit better display than Samsung Galaxy S24 FE, because although it has a little bit worse 1920 x 1080 pixels resolution and a really smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little more pixels per display inch. The HTC One M9 features a much more powerful CPU than Galaxy S24 FE, because although it has less RAM memory, it also counts with a 64-bit processor, more cpu cores and an additional graphics co-processor.
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE counts with much more memory capacity for games and applications than HTC One M9, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with more internal storage. The Samsung Galaxy S24 FE features a much better battery life than HTC One M9, because it has a 4700mAh battery size against 2840mAh.
HTC One M9 counts with a little bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy S24 FE, although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for shooting photographs in poorly lited environments and a camera with way less mega pixels.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we compare here, the HTC One M9 is also a bargain compared to others, which makes this phone an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.