Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | HTC |
| Android 14 | -- |
| -- | 2017-02-21 |
| 6.38 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches | 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.51 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Blue, Graphite, Gray, Mint and Yellow | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 650.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | S-LCD 5 |
| 385 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 1900 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.2 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 2400e (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Xclipse 940 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.21 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.56 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The HTC U Ultra is slightly better than the Galaxy S24 FE, having a 77 score against 76. HTC U Ultra is a a lot lighter cellphone than Galaxy S24 FE, but both are equally thin. HTC U Ultra features a much faster CPU than Galaxy S24 FE, because although it has a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with a higher number of faster cores.
The Galaxy S24 FE has a bit sharper screen than HTC U Ultra, because although it has a much lower display density and a little worse 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a bigger screen. HTC U Ultra features a much bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy S24 FE, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 1,95 TB.
Galaxy S24 FE counts with a very superior battery life than HTC U Ultra, because it has 4700mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh. The HTC U Ultra captures a little bit better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S24 FE, although it has a lot worse resolution back-facing camera, they both have the same aperture.
Although HTC U Ultra is a better device, it is more expensive than the Galaxy S24 FE, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Galaxy S24 FE. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can buy Galaxy S24 FE, giving up a few specs and features, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.