Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 14 | -- |
| -- | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.38 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.51 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Blue, Graphite, Gray, Mint and Yellow | Black and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 650.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 1900 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 2400e (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Xclipse 940 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.56 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ is just a bit better than the Galaxy S24 FE, having an 81.3 score against 76. The LG V35 ThinQ is a notably lighter and a little thinner cellphone than Galaxy S24 FE. The Galaxy S24 FE counts with a bit more vivid screen than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a much worse display density and a way worse 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a quite larger screen.
The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a much better performing processing unit than Galaxy S24 FE, because although it has a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with a higher number of cores. The LG V35 ThinQ has a much greater storage capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy S24 FE, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 1,95 TB.
LG V35 ThinQ captures a little bit better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy S24 FE, because although it has a camera in the back with much less megapixels, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture to capture better low-light photos and videos. The Galaxy S24 FE features a really longer battery life than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 4700mAh battery size instead of 3300mAh.
The LG V35 ThinQ not only is the best phones of the ones in this comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.