Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 14 | -- |
| -- | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.38 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.51 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Blue, Graphite, Gray, Mint and Yellow | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 650.00 | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 1900 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 2400e (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Xclipse 940 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.56 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Velvet has a general score of 87.1, which is better than Galaxy S24 FE's 76 global score. The LG Velvet design has the same thickness than the Galaxy S24 FE, but it is somewhat lighter. Galaxy S24 FE has a brighter screen than LG Velvet, although it has a quite lower 1080 x 2340 resolution, a little bit worse amount of pixels per inch of display and a quite smaller display.
The LG Velvet features a way bigger memory to store more apps and games than Galaxy S24 FE, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the LG Velvet also has an external memory card slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. The LG Velvet features a very superior CPU than Samsung Galaxy S24 FE, because although it has less RAM memory, it also counts with a larger number of cores.
The Samsung Galaxy S24 FE counts with a bit longer battery duration than LG Velvet, because it has a 4700mAh battery capacity against 4300mAh. LG Velvet has a way better camera than Samsung Galaxy S24 FE, although it has a camera in the back with a worse resolution, they both have the same camera aperture.
The LG Velvet is not only the best phones of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also by far the cheapest one, which makes this phone an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.