Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 14 | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| -- | 2016-09-01 |
| 6.38 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.51 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Blue, Graphite, Gray, Mint and Yellow | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 650.00 | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 1900 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.2 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 2400e (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Xclipse 940 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.56 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S24 FE has a score of 76, which is a bit better than Moto Z Force's general score of 75.8. Both phones we are comparing work with Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy S24 FE has an older 14 version while Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat version. Even being the best cellphone we compare here, the Galaxy S24 FE is a incredibly heavier and just a bit thicker cellphone than the Moto Z Force.
The Moto Z Force counts with a very superior performance than Galaxy S24 FE, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with 3 more processing cores. The Samsung Galaxy S24 FE has a little bit better looking screen than Moto Z Force, because although it has a way lower pixels count per inch in the screen and a little lower resolution of 1080 x 2340, it also counts with a larger screen.
Motorola Moto Z Force has much more storage capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S24 FE, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Samsung Galaxy S24 FE counts with a very superior battery duration than Moto Z Force, because it has 4700mAh of battery capacity.
Moto Z Force counts with just a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy S24 FE, although it has a back-facing camera with way less MP resolution, they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture.
Although Galaxy S24 FE is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Motorola Moto Z Force, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Motorola Moto Z Force. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can get Motorola Moto Z Force, giving up a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.