Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.38 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.51 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Blue, Graphite, Gray, Mint and Yellow | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 650.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| 1900 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.2 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 2400e (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Xclipse 940 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Nano SIM Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.56 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola razr (2020) has a general score of 87, which is better than Galaxy S24 FE's global score of 76. Both devices we compare here come with Android OS, but the Motorola razr (2020) has 11 version and Galaxy S24 FE has Android 14. Motorola razr (2020)'s construction has the same thickness than Galaxy S24 FE, but it is just a little lighter.
Motorola razr (2020) counts with a much better processing power than Samsung Galaxy S24 FE, and although they both have 8 GB of RAM memory, the Motorola razr (2020) also has more cores. The Galaxy S24 FE has a more vivid display than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a little bit larger screen, a just a bit greater pixel density and a slightly better 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution.
The Motorola razr (2020) takes way better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S24 FE, because although it has a camera in the back with a worse 48 mega pixels resolution, it also counts with a larger diafragm aperture to take better captures and video in low light environments. The Motorola razr (2020) counts with a superior memory for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S24 FE, because it has more internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy S24 FE has a superior battery performance than Motorola razr (2020), because it has 4700mAh of battery capacity.
The Motorola razr (2020) costs a lot more money than the Galaxy S24 FE, but you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.