Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| -- | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.38 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.51 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Blue, Graphite, Gray, Mint and Yellow | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 650.00 | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 1900 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 2400e (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Xclipse 940 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.56 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A50 is much better than the Galaxy S24 FE, with a score of 83.8 against 76. The Samsung Galaxy A50 construction is a lot lighter and a little thinner than Galaxy S24 FE. The Galaxy S24 FE counts with a more vivid screen than Galaxy A50, because although it has a quite lower pixel quantity per display inch, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2340, the Galaxy S24 FE also counts with a bit larger display.
Samsung Galaxy A50 counts with a much bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S24 FE, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy A50 also has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 512 GB.
The Galaxy A50 counts with a really superior hardware performance than Galaxy S24 FE, because although it has a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with a greater number of cores. The Samsung Galaxy S24 FE has superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy A50, because it has 4700mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Samsung Galaxy A50 captures a little bit better photos and videos than Galaxy S24 FE, because although it has a much less megapixels resolution back facing camera, it also counts with a larger aperture.
Galaxy A50 is not only the best phones between the ones we are comparing, but it's also very cheap compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.