Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-10-20 |
| 6.38 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.51 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Blue, Graphite, Gray, Mint and Yellow | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 650.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 1900 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 2400e (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Xclipse 940 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.56 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50s is better than Samsung Galaxy S24 FE, getting a overall score of 86.6 against 76. Galaxy A50s's body is a little thinner and notably lighter than the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE. These phones have Android operating system, but Galaxy A50s has 10 version while Samsung Galaxy S24 FE has Android 14 version.
The Samsung Galaxy A50s features a much better hardware performance than Galaxy S24 FE, because although it has lesser RAM, it also counts with a higher number of cores. Galaxy S24 FE has a more vivid display than Galaxy A50s, because although it has a little less pixels per display inch, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2340px, the Galaxy S24 FE also counts with a bit bigger display.
Galaxy A50s shoots way better photos and videos than Galaxy S24 FE, although it has a camera in the back with a lower resolution and a tinier aperture which is not so good for shooting photographs or video in low light situations. Galaxy A50s counts with a much bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S24 FE, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A50s also has a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 512 GB.
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE counts with improved battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A50s, because it has a 4700mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.