Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| -- | 2019-12-27 |
| 6.38 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.51 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Blue, Graphite, Gray, Mint and Yellow | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 650.00 | $ 282.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 1900 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 2400e (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Xclipse 940 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.56 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A51 is much better than the Galaxy S24 FE, getting a score of 85.5 against 76. The Samsung Galaxy A51 construction has the same thickness than the Galaxy S24 FE, but it's lighter. Both phones in this comparison use Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy A51 has 11 version and Galaxy S24 FE has Android 14.
Galaxy A51 has a lot better processing power than Galaxy S24 FE, because although it has lesser RAM, it also counts with a higher number of cores (and faster). The Galaxy S24 FE has a brighter display than Samsung Galaxy A51, because although it has a little bit worse screen density and a quite lower 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a quite bigger display.
Galaxy A51 takes way better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy S24 FE, although it has a lesser megapixels back-facing camera and a tinier aperture which is not good for low-light photography and video. Samsung Galaxy A51 has a much bigger storage to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S24 FE, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A51 also has a SD memory slot that holds up to 512 GB.
Galaxy S24 FE counts with greater battery duration than Galaxy A51, because it has an 18% more battery capacity.
Even being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, the Galaxy A51 is also very cheap compared to the other devices, which makes it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.