Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.38 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.51 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Blue, Graphite, Gray, Mint and Yellow | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 650.00 | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| 1900 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 2400e (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Xclipse 940 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.56 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a global score of 98.9, which is much better than Galaxy S24 FE's 76 overall score. These devices use Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has an older 13 version while Galaxy S24 FE has Android 14 version. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra's construction is a bit thicker but just a little bit lighter than Galaxy S24 FE.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a way better performance than Galaxy S24 FE, because it has more RAM and a greater number of cores. Galaxy S24 FE counts with a slightly better screen than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, although it has a little bit smaller display, a bit lower pixels density and a lot lower 1080 x 2340px resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a greater camera than Galaxy S24 FE, and although they both have the same diafragm aperture, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a much higher 108 mega-pixels resolution back camera. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a much bigger storage for applications and games than Galaxy S24 FE, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 1000 GB.
Galaxy S24 FE features just a bit better battery lifetime than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because it has 4700mAh of battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is way more expensive than the Galaxy S24 FE, but it's still a great choice, as you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.