Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 5.1 |
| -- | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.38 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.51 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Blue, Graphite, Gray, Mint and Yellow | Black, Gold, Gray and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass; metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 650.00 | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 1900 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 9.2 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 2400e (4 nm) chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Xclipse 940 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 6.21 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time |
| 6.56 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 5 is a bit better than Galaxy S24 FE, with a global score of 79.3 against 76. Both of these phones include Android operating system, but Galaxy Note 5 has older 5.1 version while Galaxy S24 FE has Android 14. The Galaxy Note 5 construction is a bit thinner and somewhat lighter than Galaxy S24 FE.
Galaxy Note 5 counts with an extremely better processing unit than Galaxy S24 FE, although it has less RAM memory, they both have a Single-Core processor. Samsung Galaxy Note 5 features a bit sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy S24 FE, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 2560 x 1440px resolution and a higher screen pixel density.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 5 shoots just a bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy S24 FE, although it has a back-facing camera with a lot lower 16 megapixels resolution and a smaller aperture which is not nice for taking photographs and video in low-light environments. Galaxy S24 FE has a lot bigger storage for applications and games than Galaxy Note 5, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity.
Galaxy S24 FE counts with a superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has a 57% more battery capacity.
Even being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, the Samsung Galaxy Note 5 is also a bargain compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.