Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| -- | 2015-08-21 |
| 6.38 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.51 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Blue, Graphite, Gray, Mint and Yellow | Black sapphire, Gold platinum, Silver titan and White pearl |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 650.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 1900 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.2 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 2400e (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Xclipse 940 GPU | Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.56 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note5 is just a bit better than Galaxy S24 FE, having a score of 80.2 against 76. The Galaxy Note5 is a just a bit thinner and lighter device than Galaxy S24 FE. Galaxy Note5 has a much better performing processing unit than Galaxy S24 FE, because although it has lesser RAM, it also counts with a larger number of cores.
The Galaxy S24 FE counts with a bit more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy Note5, because although it has a way worse pixels density and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, it also counts with a larger screen. Samsung Galaxy Note5 features just a bit better camera than Galaxy S24 FE, although it has a lot less mega-pixels camera in the back and a tinier camera aperture.
Galaxy S24 FE features a much greater storage capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Note5, because it has 64 GB more internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy S24 FE has a really longer battery lifetime than Galaxy Note5, because it has 4700mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.