Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| -- | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.38 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches | 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.51 ounces | 5.29 ounces |
| Blue, Graphite, Gray, Mint and Yellow | Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 650.00 | $ 408.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| 1900 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 2400e (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Xclipse 940 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.56 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10e is much better than Galaxy S24 FE, having an 86.3 score against 76. The Galaxy S10e is a noticeably lighter device than the Galaxy S24 FE, but both of them are equally thin. Samsung Galaxy S24 FE features a much better looking display than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because although it has a bit lower quantity of pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a larger display and a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2340px.
Galaxy S10e features a superior memory capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S24 FE, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Galaxy S10e also has an external memory card slot that supports up to 512 GB. Galaxy S10e features a much better performing processor than Galaxy S24 FE, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a higher number of faster cores.
The Galaxy S10e features just a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy S24 FE, because although it has a much less megapixels resolution back-facing camera, it also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better captures and videos in low light environments. The Samsung Galaxy S24 FE counts with a much longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because it has 4700mAh of battery capacity.
Galaxy S10e not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing, but it's also by far the cheapest one, making this phone a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.