Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.38 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.51 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Blue, Graphite, Gray, Mint and Yellow | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 650.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| 1900 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 2400e (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Xclipse 940 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Nano SIM Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.56 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has an overall score of 98, which is way better than Galaxy S24 FE's global score of 76. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G's body is a bit heavier and thicker than Galaxy S24 FE. Both devices in this comparison review come with Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has 13 version and Galaxy S24 FE has Android 14.
The Galaxy S24 FE has a little sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, although it has a just a little lower pixel count in each inch in the display, a much lower 1080 x 2340px resolution and a bit smaller display. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a much bigger memory for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S24 FE, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a SD card slot that supports up to 1000 GB.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with an extremely better CPU than Galaxy S24 FE, because it has more RAM memory and a higher number of cores. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a much better camera than Galaxy S24 FE, and although they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a way more MP camera in the back.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has just a bit better battery life than Galaxy S24 FE, because it has a 6% larger battery size.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G costs a lot more than Galaxy S24 FE, but you can get a much better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.