Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| -- | 2018-03-16 |
| 6.38 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches | 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.51 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Blue, Graphite, Gray, Mint and Yellow | Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 650.00 | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| 1900 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 2400e (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Xclipse 940 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.56 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S9 has a general score of 83.3, which is slightly better than Galaxy S24 FE's 76 score. The Samsung Galaxy S9 body is way lighter but a little bit thicker than the Galaxy S24 FE. Galaxy S24 FE counts with a bit more vivid display than Galaxy S9, because although it has a much lower pixels number per screen inch and a lot lower resolution of 1080 x 2340, it also counts with a larger display.
Galaxy S9 features more memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy S24 FE, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 400 GB. The Galaxy S9 counts with a very superior performance than Samsung Galaxy S24 FE, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with a greater number of cores.
The Galaxy S24 FE has a way better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S9, because it has a 4700mAh battery size instead of 3000mAh. The Galaxy S9 counts with a little bit better camera than Galaxy S24 FE, because although it has a camera in the back with lot less MP, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture for better photography and videos in low-light environments.
Even being the best phone in our current comparison, the Galaxy S9 is also very cheap compared to the other devices, making it an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.