Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| -- | 2020-05-05 |
| 6.38 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.51 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Blue, Graphite, Gray, Mint and Yellow | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 650.00 | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 385 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1900 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 2400e (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Xclipse 940 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Nano SIM Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.56 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy S24 FE, getting an 81.1 score against 76. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is a just a bit lighter but thicker phone than the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE. Both of these phones work with Android operating system, but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has the previous 10 version and Samsung Galaxy S24 FE has Android 14.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a way better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy S24 FE, because although it has lesser RAM memory, it also counts with more processing cores. The Galaxy S24 FE counts with a brighter display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, although it has a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a little bit worse screen density, they both have a display with the same size.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a greater camera than Galaxy S24 FE, because although it has a smaller aperture, it also counts with a back facing camera with a way higher resolution. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a better memory capacity for apps and games than Galaxy S24 FE, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 512 GB.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a little better battery lifetime than Galaxy S24 FE, because it has a 5020mAh battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is also a bargain compared to the other devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.