Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 79 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-04-07 |
| 6.38 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.51 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Blue, Graphite, Gray, Mint and Yellow | Aurora blue, Glacier white and Interstellar grey |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 650.00 | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 385 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1900 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 2400e (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Xclipse 940 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Nano SIM Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.56 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy S24 FE, getting a global score of 79 against 76. Both devices we are comparing here come with Android operating system, but Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has 11 version and Samsung Galaxy S24 FE has Android 14. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S is a just a bit lighter but thicker device than Samsung Galaxy S24 FE.
The Galaxy S24 FE counts with a much better looking display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, although it has a little bit worse pixels density and a little bit lower 1080 x 2340 resolution, they both have a same size screen. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S features a better memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S24 FE, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 512 GB.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S features a much powerful processing unit than Galaxy S24 FE, because although it has a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with more cores. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has a little better battery performance than Galaxy S24 FE, because it has 5020mAh of battery capacity. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S captures much clearer photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy S24 FE, although it has a less mega pixels resolution back-facing camera, they both have a same size camera aperture.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we compare here, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S is also a bargain compared to the other ones, making this phone an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.