Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.2 | 88.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-03-08 |
| -- | 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| -- | 5.54 ounces |
| -- | Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 281.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 501 pixels per inch | 551 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM + eSIM Battery | 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10 is much better than Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra, getting an 88.3 score against 80.2. The Galaxy S10 counts with Android 11 OS, and Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra counts with Android OS. Samsung Galaxy S10 has a really superior processing power than Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra. Both of them have a 8 GB RAM and the same number of cores.
Galaxy S10 has a better looking display than Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra, because although it has a quite smaller screen and a bit lower resolution of 1440 x 3040 pixels, it also counts with a bit more pixels per inch in the display. The Galaxy S10's camera is very similar to the camera in Galaxy S24 Ultra, although the Galaxy S10 has a back facing camera with way less megapixels resolution.
The Galaxy S10 has slightly more storage for games and applications than Galaxy S24 Ultra, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 512 GB. The Galaxy S24 Ultra has a very superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S10, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 3400mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.