Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.2 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android | -- |
| -- | 2018-03-16 |
| -- | 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches |
| -- | 5.75 ounces |
| -- | Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 501 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM + eSIM Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S9 is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra, with a overall score of 83.3 against 80.2. Samsung Galaxy S9 features a lot better processing power than Galaxy S24 Ultra, although it has 4 GB lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Samsung Galaxy S9 has a much better looking display than Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra, because although it has a bit smaller screen and a little bit worse 1440 x 2960 resolution, it also counts with a just a little better pixels count in each inch in the screen.
Galaxy S24 Ultra features more memory capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S9, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with more internal storage. Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra counts with a much better battery performance than Galaxy S9, because it has a 67 percent larger battery capacity.
Galaxy S9's camera is very similar to the Galaxy S24 Ultra one, although the Galaxy S9 has a lot less mega pixels back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.