Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 15 | -- |
| -- | 2017-11-03 |
| -- | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| -- | 6.14 ounces |
| -- | Silver and Space gray |
| -- | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.8 inches |
| -- | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| -- | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 2.7 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8650 (4 nm) chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 830 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 6.21 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 13.42 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3050mAh Dual Nano SIM + eSIM Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.04 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone X is much better than Galaxy S25 Edge (Rumored), getting a general score of 88.1 against 72.6. Apple iPhone X features a much powerful processing unit than Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge (Rumored), because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a 64 bits CPU and 5 more CPU cores.
The iPhone X counts with a much more vibrant display than Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge (Rumored), although it has a bit smaller screen. Apple iPhone X counts with a lot bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy S25 Edge (Rumored), because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity.
Galaxy S25 Edge (Rumored) features a little longer battery duration than Apple iPhone X, because it has a 3050mAh battery size against 2716mAh. Galaxy S25 Edge (Rumored) takes way better photographs and videos than Apple iPhone X, because it has a way higher video definition, a way better 200 MP resolution back-facing camera and a much bigger back-facing camera sensor shooting lot higher quality photographs and videos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.