Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | HTC |
| Android 15 | Android 5.0 |
| -- | 2015-03-01 |
| -- | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| -- | 5.54 ounces |
| -- | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| -- | Aluminium |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5 inches |
| -- | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | S-LCD 3 |
| -- | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 2.7 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8650 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 830 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 27.80mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.42 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3050mAh Dual Nano SIM + eSIM Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| -- | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 5.04 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
HTC One M9 is a bit better than Galaxy S25 Edge (Rumored), getting a score of 77.7 against 72.6. These phones come with Android OS (operating system), but HTC One M9 has the older 5.0 version while Galaxy S25 Edge (Rumored) has Android 15. The HTC One M9 has a much sharper screen than Galaxy S25 Edge (Rumored), although it has a lot smaller display.
The HTC One M9 counts with a very superior processor than Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge (Rumored), because although it has 9 GB less RAM, it also counts with a 64-bits CPU, a higher number of faster cores and an extra graphics co-processor. The Galaxy S25 Edge (Rumored) features a greater camera than HTC One M9, because it has a back facing camera with much more MP, a much larger camera sensor which gives a way better image and video quality and a much better 7680x4320 video resolution.
Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge (Rumored) features a much better storage capacity to store more apps and games than HTC One M9, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge (Rumored) has a little better battery life than HTC One M9, because it has a 7% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.