Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 15 | -- |
| -- | 2020-05-15 |
| -- | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| -- | 6.35 ounces |
| -- | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.8 inches |
| -- | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| -- | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 2.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8650 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 830 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 13.42 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3050mAh Dual Nano SIM + eSIM Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.04 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Velvet is a lot better than Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge (Rumored), getting an 87.1 score against 72.6. LG Velvet counts with a much greater performance than Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge (Rumored), because although it has 6 GB less RAM memory, it also counts with more cpu cores. LG Velvet counts with a much more vibrant screen than Galaxy S25 Edge (Rumored). Both of them have a same size screen.
Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge (Rumored) captures much better photos and videos than LG Velvet, because it has a much more mega pixels camera in the back, a lot larger sensor providing a way higher image quality and a way higher 7680x4320 video quality. LG Velvet counts with a much greater storage to store more games and applications than Galaxy S25 Edge (Rumored), and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the LG Velvet also has a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
LG Velvet features a much longer battery lifetime than Galaxy S25 Edge (Rumored), because it has a 41% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.