Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 15 | Android 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-10-02 |
| -- | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| -- | 6.77 ounces |
| -- | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.2 inches |
| -- | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| -- | 373 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 2.7 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8650 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 830 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.42 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3050mAh Dual Nano SIM + eSIM Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.04 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola razr (2020) has a global score of 87, which is better than the Galaxy S25 Edge (Rumored)'s score of 72.6. Both devices we compare here use Android OS (operating system), but the Motorola razr (2020) has the previous 11 version and Galaxy S25 Edge (Rumored) has Android 15. The Motorola razr (2020) features a way better performance than Galaxy S25 Edge (Rumored), because although it has a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with more CPU cores.
Motorola razr (2020) features a much more vibrant screen than Galaxy S25 Edge (Rumored), although it has a quite smaller display. The Motorola razr (2020) has much more storage capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge (Rumored), because it has 128 GB more internal memory capacity.
Galaxy S25 Edge (Rumored) has a much better camera than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a much higher 7680x4320 video resolution, a lot bigger back camera sensor capturing way higher quality photos and a way better 200 mega pixels resolution camera. Galaxy S25 Edge (Rumored) counts with just a little bit longer battery performance than Motorola razr (2020), because it has 3050mAh of battery capacity instead of 2800mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.