Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 15 | Android 11, 10 |
| -- | 2019-12-27 |
| -- | 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches |
| -- | 6.07 ounces |
| -- | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 282.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| -- | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| -- | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 2.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8650 (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 830 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.42 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3050mAh Dual Nano SIM + eSIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.04 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A51 is better than the Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge (Rumored), having a score of 85.5 against 72.6. These devices include Android operating system, but the Galaxy A51 has the previous 11 version while Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge (Rumored) has Android 15. The Galaxy A51 features an extremely better processor than Galaxy S25 Edge (Rumored), because although it has lesser RAM, it also counts with a larger number of cores.
Galaxy A51 counts with a much more vibrant display than Galaxy S25 Edge (Rumored), although it has a little smaller screen. The Galaxy S25 Edge (Rumored) takes better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy A51, because it has a much bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a much higher resolution camera in the back and a lot higher 7680x4320 video definition.
The Galaxy A51 features a very superior storage capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge (Rumored), and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Galaxy A51 also has a SD memory card expansion slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy A51 features improved battery performance than Galaxy S25 Edge (Rumored), because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3050mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.