Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 87.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 15 | Android 10 |
| -- | 2020-05-12 |
| -- | 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| -- | 7.73 ounces |
| -- | Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| -- | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| -- | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 2.7 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8650 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 830 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 13.42 | 12.98 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3050mAh Dual Nano SIM + eSIM Battery | 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.04 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a global score of 87.9, which is much better than Galaxy S25 Edge (Rumored)'s 72.6 score. These devices have Android operating system, but the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has the older 10 version while Galaxy S25 Edge (Rumored) has Android 15. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a lot better looking screen than Galaxy S25 Edge (Rumored), although it has a quite smaller screen.
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a lot better processing power than Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge (Rumored), because although it has a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with a larger number of faster cores. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro and Galaxy S25 Edge (Rumored) both count with similar memory capacity for games and applications, both of them have the same 128 GB internal memory capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge (Rumored) features just a bit better camera than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, and although they both have the same 7680x4320 video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge (Rumored) also has a way higher resolution back facing camera and a larger sensor capturing better quality photographs.
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with a superior battery lifetime than Galaxy S25 Edge (Rumored), because it has a 4700mAh battery capacity against 3050mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.