Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 15 | Android 10 |
| -- | 2020-05-05 |
| -- | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| -- | 7.37 ounces |
| -- | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| -- | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| -- | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 2.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8650 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 830 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.42 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3050mAh Dual Nano SIM + eSIM Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.04 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is better than the Galaxy S25 Edge (Rumored), having an 81.1 score against 72.6. Both of these devices come with Android OS (Operating System), but Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has the older 10 version and Galaxy S25 Edge (Rumored) has Android 15 version. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a much more powerful CPU than Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge (Rumored), because although it has a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with more cores.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with an incredibly better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge (Rumored), although it has a little smaller screen. The Galaxy S25 Edge (Rumored) shoots better photographs and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because it has a lot more MP back camera, a way better video definition and a larger back-facing camera sensor providing a higher image quality.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a greater storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S25 Edge (Rumored), because although it has just 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a very superior battery lifetime than Galaxy S25 Edge (Rumored), because it has a 5020mAh battery size instead of 3050mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.