Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 85.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 15 | iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x |
| -- | 2019-09-20 |
| -- | 6.22 x 3.06 x 0.32 inches |
| -- | 7.97 ounces |
| -- | Gold, Midnight green, Silver and Space gray |
| -- | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| -- | 2688 x 1242 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| -- | 456 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 2.7 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8650 (4 nm) chipset | Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 830 GPU | Apple-designed 4 core GPU |
| 6.21 | 10.35 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 13.42 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3050mAh Dual Nano SIM + eSIM Battery | 3969mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.04 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max has a score of 85.3, which is much better than the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored)'s score of 72.6. Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max comes with iOS 15.x OS, while Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored) comes with Android 15 OS. The Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max features a way better looking display than Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), although it has a little bit smaller display.
The Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored) counts with a much greater storage capacity for games and applications than iPhone 11 Pro Max, because it has 128 GB internal storage. IPhone 11 Pro Max features a much powerful processor than Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), because although it has a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with a 64-bits processing unit and a greater number of cores (and also faster).
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max has longer battery life than Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), because it has 3969mAh of battery capacity instead of 3050mAh. Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored) captures way better pictures and videos than iPhone 11 Pro Max, because it has a camera in the back with lot more MP, a way larger back camera sensor providing a way higher image quality and a lot higher video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.