Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 15 | -- |
| -- | 2018-09-21 |
| -- | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| -- | 6.24 ounces |
| -- | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| -- | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.8 inches |
| -- | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| -- | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 2.7 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8650 (4 nm) chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 830 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 6.21 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 13.42 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3050mAh Dual Nano SIM + eSIM Battery | 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.04 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone XS is better than the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), with a global score of 84.2 against 72.6. Apple iPhone XS features a really superior performance than Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), because although it has 8 GB less RAM memory, it also counts with a 64 bits CPU and more CPU cores.
Apple iPhone XS features a much more vibrant display than Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), although it has a quite smaller screen. Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored) features a much bigger memory to install applications and games than iPhone XS, because it has 128 GB internal storage. Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored) features a greater camera than Apple iPhone XS, because it has a way better 7680x4320 video quality, a lot better resolution camera and a way bigger sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored) counts with a bit longer battery life than iPhone XS, because it has 3050mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.