Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 15 | -- |
| -- | 2018-10-18 |
| -- | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| -- | 5.22 ounces |
| -- | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.5 inches |
| -- | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| -- | 439 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 2.7 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8650 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 830 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.42 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3050mAh Dual Nano SIM + eSIM Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.04 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 has a global score of 80, which is better than the Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored)'s score of 72.6. Google Pixel 3 features a very superior processing unit than Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), because although it has less RAM, it also counts with a greater number of cores. Google Pixel 3 has a way better display than Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), although it has a quite smaller screen.
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored) shoots way better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 3, because it has a way better 7680x4320 video definition, a back camera with much more megapixels and a way larger sensor which provides a much better image and video quality. The Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored) has a much bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 3, because it has more internal memory capacity.
Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored) features just a bit better battery performance than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 5% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.