Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 15 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-05-07 |
| -- | 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches |
| -- | 5.19 ounces |
| -- | Black, Purple and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 186.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.6 inches |
| -- | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| -- | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 2.7 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8650 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 830 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.42 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3050mAh Dual Nano SIM + eSIM Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.04 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3a is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), having a 78.8 score against 72.6. Both phones in this comparison review include Android OS (Operating System), but Google Pixel 3a has an older 11 version while Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored) has Android 15. The Google Pixel 3a has a much better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), although it has a little bit smaller screen.
Google Pixel 3a features an extremely better processor than Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), because although it has a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with a higher number of cores (and also faster). The Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored) counts with a superior storage capacity to install games and applications than Google Pixel 3a, because it has more internal storage.
The Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored) counts with just a bit longer battery lifetime than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a 2% greater battery size. Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored) shoots way better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a much higher 7680x4320 video resolution, a way bigger sensor providing a way better image quality and a way more mega pixels back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.