Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | HTC |
| Android 15 | Android 5.0 |
| -- | 2015-03-01 |
| -- | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| -- | 5.54 ounces |
| -- | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| -- | Aluminium |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5 inches |
| -- | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | S-LCD 3 |
| -- | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 2.7 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8650 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 830 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 27.80mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.42 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3050mAh Dual Nano SIM + eSIM Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| -- | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 5.04 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The HTC One M9 has a general score of 77.7, which is a little bit better than the Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored)'s 72.6 score. These devices have Android OS, but HTC One M9 has an older 5.0 version and Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored) has Android 15 version. The HTC One M9 features a much greater performance than Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), because although it has a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with 7 more processing cores, a 64-bit processing unit and an additional graphics processor.
HTC One M9 has a lot better display than Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), although it has a way smaller display. The Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored) counts with a much better memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than HTC One M9, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored) takes much better photographs and videos than HTC One M9, because it has a much better 200 MP resolution camera in the back, a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor which gives a much better photo and video quality and a way higher video resolution. Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored) features a bit superior battery life than HTC One M9, because it has a 7 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.