Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 15 | -- |
| -- | 2018-06-08 |
| -- | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| -- | 5.57 ounces |
| -- | Black and Gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6 inches |
| -- | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| -- | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 2.7 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8650 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 830 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 13.42 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3050mAh Dual Nano SIM + eSIM Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.04 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ has a global score of 81.3, which is better than the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored)'s score of 72.6. The LG V35 ThinQ features a much greater performance than Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a higher number of cores (and they are faster).
The LG V35 ThinQ has a much better looking screen than Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), although it has a quite smaller screen. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored) features a greater camera than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a much better video quality, a much better resolution back-facing camera and a much bigger back camera sensor providing a lot higher image quality.
LG V35 ThinQ counts with much more storage capacity for apps and games than Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. The LG V35 ThinQ has just a little better battery life than Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), because it has a 3300mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.