Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 15 | Android 10 |
| -- | 2018-10-18 |
| -- | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| -- | 5.96 ounces |
| -- | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| -- | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| -- | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 2.7 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8650 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 830 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 13.42 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3050mAh Dual Nano SIM + eSIM Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.04 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG V40 ThinQ is better than the Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), having an 81.2 score against 72.6. These devices include Android operating system, but LG V40 ThinQ has the previous 10 version and Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored) has Android 15. LG V40 ThinQ has a lot better display than Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), although it has a little smaller display.
LG V40 ThinQ counts with a lot bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. The LG V40 ThinQ counts with a way better processing power than Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a larger number of cores.
The LG V40 ThinQ has just a little better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), because it has an 8% more battery capacity. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored) captures much better pictures and videos than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has a lot better video definition, a way more MP camera in the back and a much bigger camera sensor capturing much better quality videos and photos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.